by Al Benson Jr.
With his Marxist-oriented theological worldview, Obama/Sotero continues to appoint "czars" to run his hoped-for "dictatorship of the proletariat" that would gag any self-respecting maggot.
One of the latest and most notorious appointees to the Obamunist czardom is a man named Cass Sunstein. This individual was recently confimed to his new post as "Regulatory Czar." One can only imagine what he plans to "regulate" (probably our liberties). Comrade Obama has appointed whole coteries of far-left radicals for different positions and czardoms, but Mr. Sunstein is a real beaut! Here is a man the Right Wing News
http://www.rightwingnews.com described on July 23rd as a "totalitarian screwball." And they further noted that: "Considering the mountains of extraneous regulations that accrue in the District of Criminals with each passing day, he'll have many opportunities to apply his ideology." Of that I have no doubt whatever. Although I may not have said it quite the same way they did, I have to agree with their assessment.
Sunstein comes to his new czardom with some rather odd ideas that I'm sure the prostitute press in this country is not about to mention to John Q. Public. Jim Brown, writing for
http://www.onenewsnow.com on July 22nd said of Sunstein: "A consumer freedom group says President Obama's nominee for 'regulatory czar' is an animal-rights zealot who may make life difficult for hunters and meat-eaters...If Cass Sunstein is ultimately confirmed to be the regulatory czar (he has been) having an animal-rights zealot in that position could be problematic for Americans who love to hunt, who like seeing circuses, who like taking their kids to the zoo, who like feeding their children meat and milk at lunch time." That statement was made by David Martosko of the Center for Consumer Freedom.
One of Mr. Sunstein's worldview problems is that he thinks animals ought to have the right to sue people. Yes, folks, you read that right. He thinks animals should be able to sue people. Sunstein says: "(R)epresentatives of animals should be able to bring private suits to ensure that anticruelty and related laws are actually enforced. Of course, any animals would be represented by human beings, just like any other litigant who lacks ordinary human competence; for example, the interests of children are protected by prosecutors...If getting rid of the idea that animals are property is helpful in reducing suffering, then we should get rid of the idea that animals are property." A little equine or bovine Marxism? So you farmers and ranchers need to start getting used to the idea that your livestock isn't really your property. I suppose at that point, all animals will come under the benevolent "protection" of the state, because, after all, who but an all-wise federal government can really "feel the pain" of the animals and therefore be able to empathize with them enough to protect them from those nasty livestock owners who only want to use them to make filthy lucre. It's too bad that Sunstein doesn't seem to feel that much concern or compassion for unborn babies about to be aborted. I suppose he feels that if less kids are born there will be less of them around to abuse his pet animals.
And Sunstein would also like to outlaw meat-eating, which I suppose he would implement by "regulating" the use of firearms so no one would have them to hunt with. I have no problem with vegetarianism, as long as the choice is left up to individuals as to whether they decide on such a diet or not. When the government starts to decide it then it becomes vegecommunism. Eating habits should not be federally mandated to protect dogies, mule deer, and raccoons!
I'm sure Mr.Sunstein would love to get his totalitarian mitts on the Internet too. He has commented that: "We hardly need to imagine a world, however, in which people and institutions are being harmed by the rapid spread of damaging falsehoods via the Internet. We live in that world. What might be done to reduce the harm?" Loose translation: Since we already have the managed media in our back pockets, the only place left where we are really being exposed for what we are is the Internet and so we have to find a way to gain control of that to keep Americans stupid!
Now that Mr. Sunstein has been (duly?) confirmed for his czardom he is ready to tell us how he really feels. He's in favor of socialism (as if we didn't already know). He wouldn't have been appointed otherwise. And he goes further to inform us that the white majority in this country that is opposed to socialism is, guess what, racist, naturally! But, then, you knew that already, didn't you?
Sunstein says: "The absence of a European-style social welfare state is certainly connected with the widespread perception among the white majority that the relevant programs would disproportionately benefit African Americans (and more recently Hispanics").
So there you have "Sunstein's truth"--us white folks don't like welfare because we are afraid the blacks and Hispanics will get all the goodies! Such a ludicrous statement doesn't even qualify as hogwash. We don't like welfare because it supports a whole body of parasitic people out there, of whatever color, that could be working, but choose not to, that are more than happy to let the taxpayers foot the bill for their existence. I couldn't care less what color a man or woman is. If they can work they should, and I shouldn't have to pay for both my family and theirs to live. I have enough problems taking care of my own family without having to support someone who can work and chooses not to. I realize there are some folks on welfare that, for various medical reasons, cannot work. I'm not talking about them, although I'd like to see private agencies take more of a role in helping them and the federal government take less. But don't have the gall to tell me and other white folks that we are against socialism and communism because we are afraid it will benefit the non-white population. Such statements are nothing but bovine fertilizer. Of course people at the federal level seem more than adept at spreading that around.
I guess I'm not really surprised that Congress confirmed this Marxist mentality for this post. It shows how little they think of us ordinary folks. I really hope the public is keeping and will continue to keep track of all this and that, if we are still able to vote in 2010, we will clean house in Congress. Most of the people in that august body should be ashamed to show their faces in public. Maybe that's why some of them cancelled their town hall meetings last August.
How true are the words of Psalm 12:8--"The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted."